Welcome to all who enter in at these gates.

My name is Jason Jennings. I'm 38 years old, and I'm from Collinsville, OK. If you are viewing this blog it's because you most likely have seen my videos and/or comments on Youtube in the past years. My belief and views are unlike many others out there that claim to have found truth when all they have found is a lie in its many forms. If you have now thought of me as possibly being one of those same victims, this blog is not for you. You have found what you are looking for. I'm not seeking to give directions to someone who does not think they are lost. A man does not know when he is lost if he has no knowledge of where he began or his intended destination.

I do not belong to any of this world's religions nor of this world's versions of Christianity. I belong to one church, and one body, having one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and father of all. I will not be one to tell you what I "believe" because I am confident of this very thing: "If any man loves God, the same is known of him." I do not count my father a liar when he says, "Turn at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you," and again, "Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeks to be obstinate with all wisdom," and again, "My son, if you will receive my words, and hide my commandments with you; So that you incline your ear unto wisdom, to apply your heart to understanding; Yes, if you cry after knowledge, lifting up your voice for understanding; If you seek her as silver, and search for her as hidden treasures; Then shall you understand the fear of the Self-Existent, and find the knowledge of God," and again, "The fear of the Self-Existent is the beginning of knowledge."

I rarely give book/chapter/verse references. Search the scriptures for yourselves if you feel the need. Occasionally I may refer to the book quoted.

I do not argue about various translations of the bible, seeing all that does is create strife. I trust my God to reveal to me (and anyone else that has come to him with a whole heart) only truth according to his word. He has said, "All the words of my mouth are in righteousness; nothing to struggle with or distorted in them. They are all straightforward to him that understands, and right to them that find knowledge." If you believe man (or Satan for that matter) is more powerful than God to be able to deceive his chosen people with various erroneous translations, again this blog is not for you. Erroneous translations are only a stumbling block to those that are blind. It's much easier to deceive someone of their surroundings when they sit in darkness, but if light is shed, the deceiver himself is made known.

If you have attempted to carry over a doctrine from a previous life (and, no, I'm not speaking buddhist here) into his new and glorious life, then you have yet to flee Egypt. True, a sowing may have taken place, but if care and a hope of bringing forth good fruit is not present within the farmer (not you), the ground in which it was planted (you) cannot bring forth that good fruit, but yields bad fruit which is unprofitable to the farmer and is tossed out as compost. I intend to love and care for all the good land that the Lord has and will bless me with.

I do not argue about names, for there is given one name, "a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of in heaven, and in earth, and under the earth; And every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the father." I do not play name games: just as Mary is Maria in Spanish, they both have the same meaning. If you disagree, again, this blog is not for you.

I have a great desire that even those that have left my blog up to this point might be granted repentance to the acknowledging of the truth, but he did say that the time would come when "they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away the ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."

I do not claim to be at a final destination either. As Paul said, "I do not count myself to have apprehended: but one thing, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus. Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing you be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you."

"The path of the just is as the shining light, that shines more and more unto the perfect day."

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Hanging On To A Dream

From the movie "Goodbye, My Fancy" (1951).
The character, Matt Cole, in this film is a Time Magazine reporter (media) who plays a previous love interest of Agatha Reed and brings the content of Ms. Reed's film to the attention of the Head of the College. The President is basically the "face" of the Head of the College, whom she thought she loved but didn't really know at all.

The "Laughing Cavalier" is a painting which was removed from the office of the President and placed in the dorm room in which Ms. Reed was staying.


Laughing Cavalier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see The Laughing Cavalier (disambiguation)

The Laughing Cavalier (1624) is a portrait by the Dutch 

Golden Age painter Frans Hals in the Wallace Collection

in London, which has been described as "one of the

most brilliant of all Baroque portraits".[1] The title is an

invention of the Victorian public and press
, dating from

its exhibition in the opening display at the Bethnal Green 

Museum in 1872–75, just after its arrival in England,

where it soon began to be regularly reproduced as prints,
was among of the best known old master paintings in 

Britain. The unknown subject is in fact not laughing, but 
can be said to have an enigmatic smile, much amplified 
by his upturned moustaches.




e·nig·ma
 [uh-nig-muh]  Show IPA

noun, plural e·nig·mas; Chiefly Archaic e·nig·ma·ta [uh-nig-muh-tuh]  Show IPA .
1.    a puzzling or inexplicable occurrence or situation: His disappearance is an           
         enigma that has given rise to much speculation.
2.
a person of puzzling or contradictory character: To me he has always been an enigma, one minute completely insensitive, the next moved to tears.
3.
a saying, question, picture, etc., containing a hidden meaning;riddle.


Description[edit]

The portrait measures 83 × 67.3 cm (32.7 × 26.5 in) and 
is inscribed at top right "Æ'TA SVÆ 26/A°1624", which 
expands to "aetatis suae 26, anno 1624" in Latin and 
means that the portrait was painted when the sitter was 26 and in the year 1624.[2] The identity of the man is 
unknown, and though the recorded 19th century titles in Dutch, English and French mostly suggest a military man, 
or at least an officer in one of the part-time militia companies that were often the subjects of group portraits, 
including some by Hals and later Rembrandt's Night Watch (1642), in fact he is as likely to be a wealthy civilian. 
The composition is lively and spontaneous, and despite the apparent labour involved in the gorgeous, and very 
expensive, silk costume, close inspection reveals long, quick brush strokes. The turning pose and low viewpoint are 
found in other portraits by Hals and here allow emphasis on the embroidered sleeve and lace cuff. There are many 
emblems in the embroidery: signifying "the pleasures and pains of love" are "bees, arrows, flaming cornucopiae
lovers' knots and tongues of fire", while an obelisk or pyramid signifies strength and Mercury's cap and caduceus 
fortune.[3]
In general, commissioned portraits such as this, rarely showed adults smiling until the late 18th century, though 
smiling is often seen in tronies and figures in genre painting. But Hals is an exception to the general rule and often 
showed sitters with broader smiles than here, and in informal poses that bring an impression of movement and 
spontaneity to his work.[4]
The effect of the eyes appearing to follow the viewer from every angle is a result of the subject being depicted as 
looking directly forward, toward the artist's point of view, combined with being a static two dimensional 
representation of this from whichever angle the painting itself is viewed.[5]

History[edit]

The painting's provenance only goes back to a sale in The Hague in 1770; after further Dutch sales it was bought 
by the Franco-Swiss banker and collector the Comte de Pourtalès-Gorgier in 1822. After his death the painting was 
acquired at the auction of his collection in Paris in 1865 by Richard Seymour-Conway, 4th Marquess of Hertford
who outbid Baron James de Rothschild at more than six times the sales estimate. It was in Hertford's Paris home 
in 1871, listed as portrait d'un homme ("portrait of a man"), and then brought to London, probably for the purpose of 
exhibiting it in a large and long loan exhibition of old master paintings at Bethnal Green, which was deliberately 
sited away from the West End of London to attract the working classes. The exhibition was a huge success and 
A Cavalier (the catalogue title) a particular hit with both public and the critics; it played a considerable part in 
raising the critical estimation of Hals in England. By 1888, when it was again exhibited at the Royal Academy, it 
had become Laughing Cavalier, though a cleaning in the intervening period (in 1884) may have changed the effect.[6] 
The critic in the Athenaeum noted a brighter appearance, but also that "The man smiles rather than laughs".[7] 
Hertford's collection was bequeathed to his natural son Sir Richard Wallace Bt., whose widow donated it and his 
London house to the nation as the Wallace Collection.