Welcome to all who enter in at these gates.

My name is Jason Jennings. I'm 38 years old, and I'm from Collinsville, OK. If you are viewing this blog it's because you most likely have seen my videos and/or comments on Youtube in the past years. My belief and views are unlike many others out there that claim to have found truth when all they have found is a lie in its many forms. If you have now thought of me as possibly being one of those same victims, this blog is not for you. You have found what you are looking for. I'm not seeking to give directions to someone who does not think they are lost. A man does not know when he is lost if he has no knowledge of where he began or his intended destination.

I do not belong to any of this world's religions nor of this world's versions of Christianity. I belong to one church, and one body, having one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and father of all. I will not be one to tell you what I "believe" because I am confident of this very thing: "If any man loves God, the same is known of him." I do not count my father a liar when he says, "Turn at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you," and again, "Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeks to be obstinate with all wisdom," and again, "My son, if you will receive my words, and hide my commandments with you; So that you incline your ear unto wisdom, to apply your heart to understanding; Yes, if you cry after knowledge, lifting up your voice for understanding; If you seek her as silver, and search for her as hidden treasures; Then shall you understand the fear of the Self-Existent, and find the knowledge of God," and again, "The fear of the Self-Existent is the beginning of knowledge."

I rarely give book/chapter/verse references. Search the scriptures for yourselves if you feel the need. Occasionally I may refer to the book quoted.

I do not argue about various translations of the bible, seeing all that does is create strife. I trust my God to reveal to me (and anyone else that has come to him with a whole heart) only truth according to his word. He has said, "All the words of my mouth are in righteousness; nothing to struggle with or distorted in them. They are all straightforward to him that understands, and right to them that find knowledge." If you believe man (or Satan for that matter) is more powerful than God to be able to deceive his chosen people with various erroneous translations, again this blog is not for you. Erroneous translations are only a stumbling block to those that are blind. It's much easier to deceive someone of their surroundings when they sit in darkness, but if light is shed, the deceiver himself is made known.

If you have attempted to carry over a doctrine from a previous life (and, no, I'm not speaking buddhist here) into his new and glorious life, then you have yet to flee Egypt. True, a sowing may have taken place, but if care and a hope of bringing forth good fruit is not present within the farmer (not you), the ground in which it was planted (you) cannot bring forth that good fruit, but yields bad fruit which is unprofitable to the farmer and is tossed out as compost. I intend to love and care for all the good land that the Lord has and will bless me with.

I do not argue about names, for there is given one name, "a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of in heaven, and in earth, and under the earth; And every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the father." I do not play name games: just as Mary is Maria in Spanish, they both have the same meaning. If you disagree, again, this blog is not for you.

I have a great desire that even those that have left my blog up to this point might be granted repentance to the acknowledging of the truth, but he did say that the time would come when "they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away the ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."

I do not claim to be at a final destination either. As Paul said, "I do not count myself to have apprehended: but one thing, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus. Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing you be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you."

"The path of the just is as the shining light, that shines more and more unto the perfect day."

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

The Reason America Fights This Enemy Called "Al-Qaeda"

The name Al-Qaeda comes from the Arabic noun qā'idah, which means foundation or basis. The initial al- is the Arabic definite article the.

This "foundation" is the enemy that they are training the people to fight against and hate. A foundation that is terrorizing them and despises their "way of life". For he has said, "As a wise masterbuilder I have laid the foundation, and another builds thereupon. For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ" And again the Lord says to Peter concerning the revelation given to him that Jesus was the Christ, the son of the living God, "Thou are Peter, and upon this rock (not Peter; for Jesus was "the stone which the builders rejected") I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." It isn't about extremist Muslims hating the West. It's all Operation Northwoods-style propaganda tactics to brainwash and train the people to hate the individuals bringing in a new government. Those that have remained in what they called "sleeper cells" waiting for orders. The only bombs they detonate will blow your mind. They will come from the sky, and will plunge deep into the heart of the city.

Now they have targeted another branch of this terrorist group which they have cleverly named Al-Shabaab. The term Shabaab means "youth" in Arabic.

So, now they state they are after the "youth" of this "foundation". Which is fitting, being that God has said, "Woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!" And again, "When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." And also, "My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you." Just as a child inexperienced in the ways of this world has much more of a struggle in establishing its own position in life if it is "thrown out to the wolves", and one that has been taught well of his father and knows how to be successful.
And as a woman has labor pains prior to and through deliverance of life into the world, for "she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and love and holiness with sobriety." 

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Operation Northwoods (1962)


Operation Northwoods

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Operation Northwoods was a series of false flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962, but were rejected by the Kennedy 
administration.[2] The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and 
elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become 
communist under Fidel Castro.[3]One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida 
cities and even in Washington".
Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. 
It stated:
The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from
a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.
Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The 
plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's 
Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by 
President John F. Kennedy.
According to currently released documentation, none of the operations became active under the auspices of the Operation Northwoods proposals.

Origins and public release[edit]

The main proposal was presented in a document entitled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)," a top secret collection of draft memoranda written 
by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).[1] The document was presented by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to Secretary of Defense Robert 
McNamara on 13 March 1962 as a preliminary submission for planning purposes. The Joint Chiefs of Staff recommended that both the covert and overt aspects of 
any such operation be assigned to them.
The previously secret document was originally made public on 18 November 1997, by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board,[4] a U.S. federal 
agency overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy's assassination.[5][6] A total of 1,521 pages of once-secret military records covering 
1962 to 1964 were concomitantly declassified by said Review Board.
"Appendix to Enclosure A" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" of the Northwoods document were first published online by the National Security Archive on 
6 November 1998 in a joint venture with CNN as part of its 1998 Cold War television documentary series[7][8]—specifically, as a documentation supplement to 
"Episode 10: Cuba," which aired on 29 November 1998.[9] "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the document which contains the proposals to stage 
The Northwoods document was published online in a more complete form, including cover memoranda, by the National Security Archive on 30 April 2001.[10]

Content[edit]

In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document listed methods, 
and outlined plans, that the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. According to Jacob Hornberger:
The plan called for U.S. personnel to disguise themselves as agents of the Cuban government and to engage in terrorist attacks on the U.S. base at Guantanamo
Bay. It also called for terrorist attacks within the United States that would be conducted by pro-U.S. forces disguising themselves as Cuban agents.
More specifically, the plan called for the following:
  1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite 
    preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment 
    plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a 
    rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
  2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban 
    forces.
    a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
    1. Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
    2. Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base.
    3. Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
    4. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[11]
    5. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
    6. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
    7. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
    8. Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
    9. Capture militia group which storms the base.
    10. Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—naphthalene.
    11. Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)).
    b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which 
    threaten the base.
    c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
  3. A "Remember the Maine" incident could be arranged in several forms:
    a. We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
    b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or 
    Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of 
    the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to 
    those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The United States could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by U.S. 
    fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.
  4. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.[12]
    The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or 
    simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. 
    Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, 
    also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.
  5. A "Cuban-based, Castro-supported" filibuster could be simulated against a neighboring Caribbean nation (in the vein of the 14 June invasion of the Dominican 
  6. Republic). We know that Castro is backing subversive efforts clandestinely against Haiti, the Dominican RepublicGuatemala, and Nicaragua at present and 
  7. possible others. These efforts can be magnified and additional ones contrived for exposure. For example, advantage can be taken of the sensitivity of the 
  8. Dominican Air Force to intrusions within their national air space. "Cuban" B-26 or C-46 type aircraft could make cane-burning raids at night. Soviet Bloc 
  9. incendiaries could be found. This could be coupled with "Cuban" messages to the Communist underground in the Dominican Republic and "Cuban" shipments 
  10. of arm which would be found, or intercepted, on the beach.
  11. Use of MIG type aircraft by U.S. pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of U.S. 
  12. military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw 
  13. a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk 
  14. inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from U.S. resources in about three months.[13]
  15. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, 
  16. genuine defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.
  17. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from 
    the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama, or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The 
    passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled 
    flight.
    a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the 
    Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all 
    boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.
    b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the 
    passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to 
    evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba 
    the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The 
    transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio[14] stations in the Western 
    Hemisphere to tell the United States what has happened to the aircraft instead of the United States trying to "sell" the incident.
  18. It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft 
  19. over international waters in an unprovoked attack.
  20. a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course 
    and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent Intervals. Crews 
    would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions 
    were taken by the Cuban MIGs.
    b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would 
    broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low 
    altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot 
    who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then 
    have disappeared.
    c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down, a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., 
    at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search 
    ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found.[15]
James Bamford wrote on Northwoods:
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on
American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., 
Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed
          on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.[16]

Related Operation Mongoose proposals[edit]

In addition to Operation Northwoods, under the Operation Mongoose program the U.S. Department of Defense had a number of similar proposals to be taken against 
the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro.
Twelve of these proposals come from a 2 February 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. 
Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the Operation Mongoose project.[17][6]
The memorandum outlines Operation Bingo, a plan to; "create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on U.S. facilities (GMO) in Cuba, thus providing an 
excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba."
It also includes Operation Dirty Trick, a plot to blame Castro if the 1962 Mercury manned space flight carrying John Glenn crashed, saying: "The objective is to provide 
irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al. Cuba [sic]." It continues, "This to be accomplished by 
manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."
Even after General Lemnitzer lost his job as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Chiefs of Staff still planned false-flag pretext operations at least into 
1963. A different U.S. Department of Defense policy paper created in 1963 discussed a plan to make it appear that Cuba had attacked a member of the Organization 
of American States (OAS) so that the United States could retaliate. The U.S. Department of Defense document says of one of the scenarios, "A contrived 'Cuban' 
attack on an OAS member could be set up, and the attacked state could be urged to take measures of self-defense and request assistance from the U.S. and OAS."
The plan expressed confidence that by this action, "the U.S. could almost certainly obtain the necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action 
against Cuba."[16][18]
Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Since both were members of the British 
Commonwealth, the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom 
into supporting a war against Castro.[16] As the U.S. Department of Defense report noted:
Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with
very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the
most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."[16]
The U.S. Department of Defense report even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for 
consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on [the U.S. Navy base at] Guantanamo."[16]

Reaction[edit]

The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence communities (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban 
Project, etc.) had already prompted President John F. Kennedy to attempt to rein in burgeoning hardline anti-Communist sentiment that was intent on proactive, 
aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy had fired CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. 
Cabell, and Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towardsVietnam. Kennedy had also stripped the CIA of responsibility for paramilitary operations 
like the Bay of Pigs and turned them over to the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which, as Commander in Chief, Kennedy could more directly 
control. Personally, Kennedy expressed outrage to many of his associates about the CIA's growing influence on civilians and government inside America[citation needed]
and his attempt to curtail the CIA's extensive Cold War and paramilitary operations was a direct expression of this concern.
Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, and it would now be the Joint Chiefs' turn to incur his displeasure. A JCS/Pentagon document (Ed Lansdale 
memo) dated 16 March 1962 titled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962 reads: "General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans 
for U.S. intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on U.S. aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for 
which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S so engaged in Berlin 
or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba."[19] The proposal was sent for approval to the Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, but was 
not implemented. (Some fifty years later when asked about the plot by journalist David Talbot, Robert McNamara drew a blank. "I have absolutely zero recollection of it. 
But I sure as hell would have rejected it," McNamara said, adding, "I really can't believe that anyone was proposing such provocative acts in Miami. How stupid!"[20])
Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander 
of NATO in January 1963. American armed forces leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the 
military, a rift that came to a head during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the Cuban Missile Crisis.
On 3 August 2001, the National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation 
Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such U.S. government plans.[21]